1. Deny the facts described in the grievance. 
2. Describe the public body's version of the facts.
3. Explain why the facts do not violate Public Meetings Law.

1. Admit to the facts described in the grievance.
2. Deny that the facts are a violation. 
3. Explain why the facts are not a violation of Public Meetings Law.

1. Admit the facts described in the grievance.
2. Admit that there was a violation of Public Meetings Law.
3. Describe what the governing body will do to address or fix it.

This includes what steps the body will take to remedy the violation and prevent it from re-occurring. Examples of this could include:

• Vote violation: re-notice meeting and redo vote within 45 days of original meeting.
• Serial meeting violation: hold a public meeting and read any email or restate any conversations or text messages.
• Recordings violation: Fix minutes or make recordings public.
• Noticing violation: re-notice and hold meeting again.
• Accommodation violation: re-notice and hold meeting in an accessible location or with interpreters.
• Identify what practices and/or processes will be changed.
• Identify if any training will occur.